CRxTraCeR
#9,708 in the world · #3,533 in United States · in the top 21% nationally. 17 official events, 45 matches won and 31 lost.
- 1606±53Rating · margin ±53
- 1541Average field · 213 entr.
- 43%vs top 5% (6–8)
What they have done so far
- Has won 1 tournament. The biggest one had 25 players entered.
- Made top 8 7 times in 17 tournaments: 41% of the time.
- Their best run is 4 tournaments in a row with the rating going up.
- Their all-time peak is 1,679 points.
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,608 points, across 119 entrants.
- They are 25 points away from the top 2,500: United States.
How the rating moved
Between 1,515 and 1,665, across 17 events with history.
Last 17 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22/03/26 | Gamers Empyean Riftbound Nexus Night Orange Park | 12 | 1534 | 3° | 3–1 | +16 |
| 01/03/26 | Regional Rebound - RQ Las Vegas Las Vegas | 418 | 1592 | 56° | 4–2 | +31 |
| 28/02/26 | Riftbound Regional Qualifier - Las Vegas Las Vegas | 1,670 | 1587 | 1122° | 2–3 | -12 |
| 27/02/26 | Pre-Regional Challenge - RQ Las Vegas Las Vegas | 797 | 1604 | 229° | 4–2 | +30 |
| 27/02/26 | Riftbound TCG 2K Presented by The People's Card Shop & Top Choice Gaming Las Vegas | 119 | 1608 | 54° | 2–3 | -3 |
| 15/02/26 | Gamers Empyean Riftbound Nexus Night Orange Park | 16 | 1536 | 16° | 0–4 | -60 |
| 13/02/26 | Friday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Jacksonville | 15 | 1502 | 7° | 2–1 | 0 |
| 12/02/26 | Coliseum of Comics Oakleaf Riftbound Spiritforged Pre-Rift Event Jacksonville | 28 | 1509 | 27° | 0–3 | -55 |
| 07/02/26 | Saturday Early Morning Spiritforged Pre-Rift Event Jacksonville | 28 | 1494 | 7° | 2–1 | -6 |
| 06/02/26 | Coliseum of Comics Arlington Riftbound Spiritforged Pre-Rift Event Jacksonville | 32 | 1489 | 11° | 2–1 | +3 |
| 10/01/26 | SCG CON Atlanta - $10K Constructed Riftbound Atlanta | 219 | 1578 | 41° | 5–3 | +9 |
| 09/01/26 | SCG CON Atlanta - $5K Constructed Riftbound Atlanta | 159 | 1594 | 64° | 3–2 | +13 |
| 04/01/26 | Gamers Empyrean Nexus Nights - 1v1 Orange Park | 16 | 1490 | 2° | 3–1 | -4 |
| 03/01/26 | Saturday Morning Summoner Skirmish - January Jacksonville | 25 | 1470 | 1° | 5–0–1 | +57 |
| 10/12/25 | Wednesday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Jacksonville | 15 | 1563 | 4° | 3–1 | +29 |
| 30/11/25 | Sunday Afternoon Nexus Night Orange Park | 20 | 1509 | 4° | 3–1 | +43 |
| 16/11/25 | Sunday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Orange Park | 29 | 1538 | 14° | 2–2 | +15 |
Form and consistency
On a 1-loss streak.
- Events with 100+ entrants 6 events 57%
- 16 to 99 8 events 55%
- Under 16 3 events 73%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
- CTCG Koko Lopez US 1981 0–2
- The AnguishedOne US 1823 1–0
- BurningX US 1793 0–1
- CTCG Minh Wins US 1787 0–1
- Kozo My Eggo US 1785 1–0
- Fr0zen US 1779 1–0
- Axe1 US 1770 1–0
- FLEX Duulan US 1764 0–1
- CB Vouz CA 1762 0–1
- georgeg US 1761 0–1
- Ummmyeh13 US 1750 1–0
- ImGonnaGoAFK US 1744 1–0
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →