daviidnavidad
#9,822 in the world · #3,577 in United States · in the top 21% nationally. 20 official events, 34 matches won and 25 lost.
- 1605±54Rating · margin ±54
- 1546Average field · 32 entr.
- 11%vs top 5% (1–8)
What they have done so far
- Made top 8 8 times in 20 tournaments: 40% of the time.
- Their best run is 8 tournaments in a row with the rating going up.
- Their all-time peak is 1,614 points.
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,599 points, across 41 entrants.
- They are 26 points away from the top 2,500: United States.
How the rating moved
Between 1,482 and 1,606, across 20 events with history.
Last 20 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/26 | Riftgate Murray Nexus Nights - 1v1 Murray | 13 | 1585 | 3° | 1–1 | -1 |
| 27/03/26 | Thursday Evening Nexus Night West Valley City | 21 | 1535 | 3° | 2–0–1 | +16 |
| 21/03/26 | SCG Riftbound Summoner Skirmish (March 2026) Salt Lake City | 26 | 1577 | 15° | 2–1 | +15 |
| 20/03/26 | Thursday Evening Nexus Night West Valley City | 21 | 1508 | 8° | 2–1 | +5 |
| 04/03/26 | Riftgate Murray Nexus Nights - 1v1 Murray | 25 | 1563 | 5° | 2–1 | +10 |
| 25/02/26 | Riftgate Murray Nexus Nights - 1v1 Murray | 28 | 1567 | 13° | 2–1 | +6 |
| 18/02/26 | Riftgate Murray Nexus Nights - 1v1 Murray | 26 | 1554 | 5° | 2–1 | +12 |
| 07/02/26 | Saturday Afternoon Spiritforged Pre-Rift Event Murray | 70 | 1559 | 9° | 1–0–3 | +10 |
| 07/02/26 | Friday Evening Spiritforged Pre-Rift Event Murray | 85 | 1546 | 11° | 2–0–2 | +22 |
| 03/01/26 | Saturday Afternoon Summoner Skirmish - January Murray | 41 | 1599 | 35° | 1–2 | -2 |
| 10/12/25 | Tuesday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Murray | 24 | 1534 | 21° | 1–2 | -19 |
| 07/12/25 | Summoner Skirmish - December Murray | 23 | 1556 | 12° | 2–3 | -8 |
| 06/12/25 | Riftbound Pro Play Qualifier Salt Lake City | 27 | 1541 | 14° | 2–3–1 | -10 |
| 03/12/25 | Tuesday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Murray | 26 | 1555 | 21° | 1–2 | -11 |
| 26/11/25 | Tuesday Night Nexus Nights - 1v1 Murray | 40 | 1525 | 30° | 1–2 | -32 |
| 23/11/25 | Saturday Evening 2v2 Nexus Night tournament! Murray | 16 | 1535 | 7° | 2–1–1 | +1 |
| 19/11/25 | Tuesday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Murray | 34 | 1520 | 2° | 3–0 | +57 |
| 12/11/25 | Tuesday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Murray | 27 | 1516 | 6° | 2–1 | +24 |
| 05/11/25 | Tuesday Evening Nexus Night - Constructed 1v1 Murray | 30 | 1492 | 10° | 2–1–2 | +28 |
| 02/11/25 | Riftbound Saturday Evening Release Event Murray | 47 | — | 35° | 1–2 | -18 |
Form and consistency
On a 1-loss streak.
- 16 to 99 19 events 49%
- Under 16 1 events 50%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
- OccuSai US 1795 0–1
- Casanova US 1794 0–2
- Bobsagetthe3rd US 1790 0–2
- FrostdOystr59 US 1729 0–1
- migi US 1722 1–1
- DubiousDuck US 1702 0–1
- 801 US 1687 0–1
- Learn Improve US 1680 2–0
- KaChow Casanova US 1679 0–1
- HM01Yourself US 1672 0–1
- Saigon Melon US 1662 1–0
- Smokez US 1657 0–1
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →