Cwispy Chicken
#23,168 in the world · #1,276 in Australia · in the top 47% nationally. 7 official events, 14 matches won and 13 lost.
- 1519±79Rating · margin ±79
- 1535Average field · 31 entr.
- 0%vs top 5% (0–2)
What they have done so far
- Their best run is 3 tournaments in a row with the rating going up.
- Their all-time peak is 1,542 points.
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,559 points, across 32 entrants.
- They are 27 points away from the top 1,000: Australia.
How the rating moved
Between 1,501 and 1,541, across 7 events with history.
Last 7 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19/01/26 | Monday Nexus Nights - 1v1 Greenacre | 26 | 1546 | 18° | 1–3 | -16 |
| 12/01/26 | Monday Nexus Nights - 1v1 Greenacre | 31 | 1533 | 9° | 3–1 | +23 |
| 08/01/26 | Thursday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Parramatta | 38 | 1533 | 13° | 2–2 | +6 |
| 04/01/26 | Sunday Afternoon Nexus Nights - 1v1 Greenacre | 17 | 1546 | 14° | 1–3 | -35 |
| 29/12/25 | Monday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Greenacre | 32 | 1559 | 10° | 3–1 | +28 |
| 22/12/25 | Monday Evening Nexus Night Greenacre | 28 | 1506 | 11° | 2–1 | +12 |
| 20/11/25 | Thursday Evening Nexus Night Parramatta | 43 | 1523 | 18° | 2–2 | +1 |
Form and consistency
On a 1-loss streak.
- 16 to 99 7 events 52%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
- AshenOCE AU 1707 0–1
- Delushunz AU 1707 0–1
- riggey AU 1662 0–1
- Bungee AU 1632 1–0
- sillything AU 1629 0–1
- Moon AU 1625 1–0
- xJAIFZ AU 1616 0–1
- bhavjan AU 1615 0–1
- Filtrophobe AU 1609 0–1
- EyeteR AU 1590 1–0
- AshenOCE AU 1580 0–1
- Dry Biskits AU 1570 1–0
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →