CaringPorcupine
#21,161 in the world · #73 in Bulgaria · in the top 42% nationally. 2 official events, 4 matches won and 2 lost.
- 1530±142Rating · margin ±142
- 1488Average field · 21 entr.
- —vs top 5%
What they have done so far
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,522 points, across 26 entrants.
How the rating moved
Between 1,475 and 1,530, across 2 events with history.
Last 2 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31/08/26 | Monday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Mladost | 16 | 1453 | 2° | 3–0 | +55 |
| 28/08/26 | Level Up - Friday Nexus Nights ul. "Vrabcha" 10 | 26 | 1522 | 21° | 1–2 | -25 |
Form and consistency
On a 4-win streak.
- 16 to 99 2 events 67%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
- Zappy BG 1672 1–0
- OG turti2 BG 1638 0–1
- VanioPatrona BG 1452 0–1
- HobbyTime BG 1397 1–0
- Caleb95 BG 1303 1–0
- SageMammyCarry BG 1260 1–0
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →