connorjam
#17,686 in the world · #699 in United Kingdom · in the top 38% nationally. 2 official events, 2 matches won and 1 lost.
- 1550±146Rating · margin ±146
- 1575Average field · 19 entr.
- —vs top 5%
What they have done so far
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,581 points, across 16 entrants.
How the rating moved
Between 1,495 and 1,550, across 2 events with history.
Last 2 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31/03/26 | Tuesday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 CF11 8AB | 22 | 1569 | 3° | 2–0–1 | +55 |
| 17/02/26 | Tuesday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 CF11 8AB | 16 | 1581 | 11° | 0–1–2 | -5 |
Form and consistency
On a 2-win streak.
- 16 to 99 2 events 33%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
- PawTheUnit GB 1638 0–1
- PadsMcGee GB 1633 1–0
- VoltaAaAaAaAaAaA GB 1630 0–1
- Me Neeko GB 1616 0–1
- Zatara GB 1575 1–0
- ProjektMgr GB 1536 0–1
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →