← Australia

Espionage

#26,380 in the world · #1,445 in Australia · in the top 53% nationally. 7 official events, 12 matches won and 15 lost.

  • 1502±73Rating · margin ±73
  • 1541Average field · 350 entr.
  • 0%vs top 5% (0–4)

What they have done so far

  • Made top 8 1 times in 7 tournaments: 14% of the time.
  • Their peak is 1,522 points, reached in May 2026: today they sit 20 points below it.
  • The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,565 points, across 1,405 entrants.
  • They are 44 points away from the top 1,000: Australia.

How the rating moved

Between 1,479 and 1,522, across 7 events with history.

Last 7 events

Date Event Entrants Field Pos. Record Rating
17/05/26 Regional Rebound - RQ Sydney Sunday 11am Grand Parade 255 1563 208° 1–3 -20
16/05/26 Riftbound Regional Qualifier - Sydney Grand Parade 1,405 1565 539° 4–3 +31
15/05/26 Super Nexus Night - RQ Sydney Friday 8pm Grand Parade 713 1523 607° 1–2 -16
13/03/26 Friday Evening Summoner Skirmish - March 1/16 Anderson St 23 1542 12° 2–2 +28
03/03/26 Tuesday Afternoon Nexus Nights - 1v1 Brisbane 23 1564 18° 1–2 -21
02/03/26 Monday Morning Nexus Nights - 1v1 Miami 16 1511 2–1 +8
23/02/26 Monday Nexus Nights - 1v1 sydney 16 1522 13° 1–2 -8

Form and consistency

On a 1-loss streak.

  • Events with 100+ entrants 3 events 43%
  • 16 to 99 4 events 46%

The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.

Toughest opponents faced

Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.

What the Field column means

Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.

Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →

IT EN
🏆 Join tournaments 📚 Read guides and strategy 🏅 Climb the leaderboards 🔔 Get notifications ⚙ Customize your profile 👤 Create your public profile
Explore the Dashboard