jaxoo
#10,316 in the world · #782 in Canada · in the top 23% nationally. 21 official events, 31 matches won and 26 lost.
- 1601±44Rating · margin ±44
- 1550Average field · 16 entr.
- 36%vs top 5% (4–7)
What they have done so far
- Made top 8 13 times in 21 tournaments: 62% of the time.
- Their best run is 3 tournaments in a row with the rating going up.
- Their all-time peak is 1,620 points.
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,635 points, across 17 entrants.
- They are 35 points away from the top 500: Canada.
How the rating moved
Between 1,481 and 1,610, across 21 events with history.
Last 21 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31/08/26 | Hairy Tarantula Monday Nexus Night M4N 2N4 | 22 | 1547 | 12° | 1–2 | -9 |
| 29/08/26 | Cardboard Classics Summoner Skirmish - August L4J 0A7 | 17 | 1635 | 6° | 2–2–1 | +14 |
| 26/08/26 | Nexus Nights L4K 2N2 | 17 | 1545 | 9° | 1–1–1 | -6 |
| 24/08/26 | Hairy Tarantula Monday Nexus Night M4N 2N4 | 16 | 1560 | 2° | 3–0 | +30 |
| 19/08/26 | Nexus Nights L4K 2N2 | 15 | 1551 | 5° | 2–1 | +11 |
| 17/08/26 | Cardboard Classics - Monday Nexus Night August 17, 2026 L4J 0A7 | 13 | 1547 | 3° | 2–1 | +12 |
| 16/08/26 | Nexpack Secret Garden Box (Chinese) Tournament L3R 1A3 | 15 | 1588 | 11° | 0–2 | -17 |
| 13/08/26 | Invasion Weekly Nexus Night L3T 1L3 | 15 | 1617 | 8° | 2–1 | +9 |
| 12/08/26 | Nexus Nights L4K 2N2 | 18 | 1570 | 3° | 2–1 | +17 |
| 10/08/26 | Hairy Tarantula Monday Nexus Night M4N 2N4 | 19 | 1533 | 6° | 2–1 | +11 |
| 01/04/26 | Nexus Nights L4K 2N2 | 16 | 1577 | 10° | 1–2 | -8 |
| 29/03/26 | Sunday Afternoon Nexus Nights - 1v1 L3R 1K9 | 17 | 1565 | 5° | 2–1 | +13 |
| 26/03/26 | Cardboard Classics - Thursday Nexus Night March 26, 2026 L4J 0A7 | 14 | 1541 | 5° | 2–1 | +22 |
| 25/03/26 | Nexus Nights L4K 2N2 | 20 | 1510 | 6° | 2–1 | +16 |
| 19/03/26 | Cardboard Classics - Thursday Nexus Night March 19 L4J 0A7 | 12 | 1516 | 7° | 1–2 | -15 |
| 18/03/26 | Nexus Nights L4K 2N2 | 12 | 1504 | 7° | 1–1–1 | +3 |
| 07/03/26 | Summoner Skirmish - March Thornhill | 14 | 1580 | 10° | 1–2–1 | -15 |
| 06/03/26 | Cardboard Classics - Thursday Nexus Night March 5 L4J 0A7 | 16 | 1483 | 8° | 2–1 | +17 |
| 27/02/26 | Cardboard Classics - Thursday Nexus Night Feb 26 L4J 0A7 | 17 | 1541 | 9° | 1–1–1 | +3 |
| 21/02/26 | Xplore Games Riftbound Nexus Night M4G 1W6 | 24 | 1512 | 11° | 0–0–1 | +12 |
| 20/02/26 | Cardboard Classics - Thursday Nexus Night February 19th 2026 L4J 0A7 | 16 | 1518 | 12° | 1–2 | -19 |
Form and consistency
On a 1-win streak.
- 16 to 99 13 events 51%
- Under 16 8 events 46%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
- Mocha CA 1824 0–2
- Ddragon999 CA 1743 0–1
- QiyanaMilkCarton CA 1743 0–1
- BlazeKnight10 CA 1736 0–1
- POG CHUNGUS CA 1730 1–1
- chiggin brest CA 1723 0–1
- Valette CA 1708 1–0
- BonkersForCheese CA 1706 2–0
- RiftKrit CA 1697 0–1
- Djen1234 CA 1690 0–1
- Brafdlog CA 1680 1–2
- Dbchiu CA 1679 0–1
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →