Jimungandr
#38,924 in the world · #2,192 in Australia · in the top 80% nationally. 6 official events, 7 matches won and 13 lost.
- 1428±76Rating · margin ±76
- 1512Average field · 292 entr.
- —vs top 5%
What they have done so far
- Made top 8 2 times in 6 tournaments: 33% of the time.
- Their all-time peak is 1,504 points.
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,565 points, across 1,405 entrants.
- They are 118 points away from the top 1,000: Australia.
How the rating moved
Between 1,426 and 1,491, across 6 events with history.
Last 6 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25/08/26 | Wollongong Nexus Night 1v1 Wollongong | 16 | 1475 | 9° | 1–2 | +2 |
| 16/05/26 | Riftbound Regional Qualifier - Sydney Grand Parade | 1,405 | 1565 | 1134° | 1–3 | -32 |
| 04/04/26 | Riftbound - 1v1 Match - April Skirmish Wollongong | 12 | 1539 | 8° | 1–2 | -6 |
| 31/03/26 | Wollongong Nexus Night 1v1 Wollongong | 13 | 1479 | 11° | 1–2 | -27 |
| 06/02/26 | Friday Evening Spiritforged Pre-Rift Event Wollongong | 16 | 1500 | 7° | 2–1–1 | +28 |
| 25/11/25 | Riftbound - 1v1 Match - Nexus Night Tuesday Wollongong | 20 | — | 15° | 1–3 | -37 |
Form and consistency
On a 3-loss streak.
- Events with 100+ entrants 1 events 25%
- 16 to 99 3 events 36%
- Under 16 2 events 33%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
- Proper AU 1627 0–1
- neoniclax 1618 0–1
- Opera AU 1613 0–1
- Xilies AU 1588 0–1
- Mahalia AU 1550 1–1
- brown sugar AU 1528 0–1
- SCEL AU 1522 0–1
- TheBootyBandit AU 1516 0–1
- renegade blood AU 1480 0–1
- TinjaAssassin1 AU 1469 1–1
- Vortus AU 1460 0–1
- Wenomechainsamaa AU 1457 1–1
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →