kirkis123456
#7,479 in the world · #116 in New Zealand · in the top 16% nationally. 5 official events, 14 matches won and 11 lost.
- 1626±70Rating · margin ±70
- 1555Average field · 73 entr.
- 27%vs top 5% (3–8)
What they have done so far
- Made top 8 2 times in 5 tournaments: 40% of the time.
- Their best run is 3 tournaments in a row with the rating going up.
- Their all-time peak is 1,647 points.
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,578 points, across 16 entrants.
- They are 14 points away from the top 100: New Zealand.
How the rating moved
Between 1,488 and 1,638, across 5 events with history.
Last 5 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/26 | Tuesday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Christchurch | 16 | 1578 | 11° | 1–2 | -12 |
| 22/08/26 | Vendetta Summoner Skirmish @ Hobby Lords Christchurch Christchurch | 16 | 1549 | 5° | 3–2 | +4 |
| 18/08/26 | Tuesday Nexus Nights - 1v1 Christchurch | 20 | 1531 | 8° | 2–1 | +6 |
| 14/08/26 | 10K Showdown - Auckland Card Show Epsom | 301 | 1572 | 22° | 7–4 | +140 |
| 09/08/26 | Hobby Lords CHCH Riftbound Sundays Christchurch | 14 | 1544 | 11° | 1–2 | -12 |
Form and consistency
On a 1-loss streak.
- Events with 100+ entrants 1 events 64%
- 16 to 99 3 events 55%
- Under 16 1 events 33%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
- raodawgzz NZ 1780 0–1
- Piero AU 1779 1–2
- ViewPsyduck NZ 1776 0–1
- Alosaur AU 1736 1–0
- Lucian GLHF NZ 1734 1–0
- PandaPooh NZ 1731 0–1
- illsory AU 1724 0–1
- voidnz NZ 1713 0–2
- WFT NZ 1690 1–0
- Kasagi AU 1674 0–1
- Peppapigpleaser NZ 1664 1–0
- Son LAGIT NZ 1636 1–0
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →