Lord Geoximus
#30,463 in the world · #151 in Czechia · in the top 57% nationally. 3 official events, 4 matches won and 4 lost.
- 1480±116Rating · margin ±116
- 1488Average field · 25 entr.
- —vs top 5%
What they have done so far
- Made top 8 1 times in 3 tournaments: 33% of the time.
- Their all-time peak is 1,540 points.
How the rating moved
Between 1,480 and 1,525, across 3 events with history.
Last 3 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/26 | Xzone Nexus Night #26.9.1 v OC Lužiny Hlavní město Praha | 36 | 1495 | 24° | 1–2 | -34 |
| 18/08/26 | Xzone Nexus Night #26.8.3 v OC Lužiny Hlavní město Praha | 28 | 1495 | 14° | 1–1–1 | -11 |
| 01/08/26 | Advík Nexus Night Na Pankráci 1685/17 | 12 | 1475 | 4° | 2–1 | +25 |
Form and consistency
On a 1-win streak.
- 16 to 99 2 events 33%
- Under 16 1 events 67%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →