mark

#14,260 in the world · #5,242 in United States · in the top 31% nationally. 2 official events, 4 matches won and 1 lost.

1572±156Rating · margin ±156
1515Average field · 30 entr.
—vs top 5%

What they have done so far

The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,535 points, across 26 entrants.

How the rating moved

Between 1,506 and 1,572, across 2 events with history.

Last 2 events

Date	Event	Entrants	Field	Pos.	Record	Rating
28/08/26	Thursday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 San Jose	26	1535	4°	3–0	+66
26/08/26	Bo3 1v1 Tuesday Nexus Nights San Jose	33	1495	25°	1–1	+6

Form and consistency

On a 4-win streak.

16 to 99 2 events 80%

The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.

Toughest opponents faced

Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.

Zhai US 1693 0–1
GLORP Mykonos US 1688 1–0
GLORP honkmimimi US 1553 1–0
Echoing First 48 US 1438 1–0
DaleDenton420 US 1353 1–0

What the Field column means

Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.

Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →