TCGAndy
#33,246 in the world · #265 in Chile · in the top 75% nationally. 20 official events, 29 matches won and 47 lost.
- 1464±39Rating · margin ±39
- 1532Average field · 19 entr.
- 0%vs top 5% (0–8)
What they have done so far
- Made top 8 3 times in 20 tournaments: 15% of the time.
- Their all-time peak is 1,518 points.
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,571 points, across 16 entrants.
- They are 18 points away from the top 250: Chile.
How the rating moved
Between 1,372 and 1,511, across 20 events with history.
Last 20 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26/08/26 | Semanal 26-08 Nexus Nights - 1v1 Viña del Mar | 21 | 1485 | 10° | 3–2 | +10 |
| 23/08/26 | Vendetta Summoner Skirmish 1 Agosto Viña del Mar | 23 | 1521 | 5° | 2–2–1 | +23 |
| 21/08/26 | Friday Evening Vendetta Summoner Skirmish I 2571439 Viña del Mar | 15 | 1529 | 12° | 1–3 | -21 |
| 19/08/26 | Wednesday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Viña del Mar | 24 | 1506 | 20° | 1–1–1 | -3 |
| 17/08/26 | Nexus Night - Netdecker 17 de Agosto Alvarez #88 Local 13 | 16 | 1571 | 9° | 2–2 | +24 |
| 03/08/26 | Nexus Night - Netdecker 03 de Agosto Alvarez #88 Local 13 | 20 | 1552 | 10° | 2–2 | +11 |
| 19/03/26 | Weekly 2500000 Viña del Mar | 18 | 1563 | 15° | 1–3 | -10 |
| 14/03/26 | Saturday Afternoon Nexus Nights - 1v1 2571469 Viña del Mar | 16 | 1550 | 5° | 2–1–1 | +32 |
| 07/03/26 | sábado Night Summoner Skirmish - March 2571469 Viña del Mar | 16 | 1545 | 10° | 1–0–3 | +26 |
| 26/02/26 | Nexus Nights - 1v1 2500000 Viña del Mar | 13 | 1556 | 11° | 1–3 | -3 |
| 14/02/26 | Saturday Afternoon Nexus Nights - 1v1 2571469 Viña del Mar | 16 | 1518 | 13° | 1–2 | 0 |
| 18/12/25 | Weekly Spells 18 Dic 2500000 Viña del Mar | 14 | 1528 | 10° | 0–3 | -28 |
| 04/12/25 | Spells Summoner Skirmish - December 2500000 Viña del Mar | 25 | 1516 | 25° | 0–5 | -54 |
| 29/11/25 | Summoner Skirmish - December Tier Cero 6500000 Villa Alemana | 31 | 1526 | 20° | 2–3 | 0 |
| 27/11/25 | Weekly n3 2500000 Viña del Mar | 20 | 1531 | 16° | 1–3–1 | -13 |
| 25/11/25 | Nexus Night - Netdecker 25 de Noviembre Alvarez #88 Local 13 | 16 | 1524 | 16° | 0–3–1 | -41 |
| 20/11/25 | Weekly Spells n2 2500000 Viña del Mar | 20 | 1522 | 6° | 2–1–2 | +27 |
| 18/11/25 | Nexus Night - Netdecker 18 de Noviembre Alvarez #88 Local 13 | 19 | 1516 | 10° | 3–2 | +14 |
| 15/11/25 | sábado Afternoon Release Event 2571469 Viña del Mar | 22 | 1544 | 17° | 2–3 | -11 |
| 13/11/25 | Weekly Spells 2500000 Viña del Mar | 21 | — | 12° | 2–3 | -19 |
Form and consistency
On a 2-loss streak.
- 16 to 99 17 events 36%
- Under 16 3 events 18%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
- Xeloo CL 1903 0–3
- qwhidhkqahsdhjka CL 1753 0–3
- Geth CL 1723 0–2
- Cupcake CL 1681 0–2
- Sieqfrozen CL 1670 1–4
- TitonLazcano CL 1607 0–1
- k9lol CL 1602 2–2
- LuluHarasser CL 1595 1–2
- Orlando Calderon CL 1587 1–0
- pableke1 CL 1577 1–1
- Jhotapez CL 1576 1–2
- Riskware CL 1566 0–3
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →