THEREDAXEMAN
#30,463 in the world · #11,245 in United States · in the top 65% nationally. 2 official events, 1 matches won and 2 lost.
- 1480±178Rating · margin ±178
- 1514Average field · 13 entr.
- —vs top 5%
What they have done so far
- Their peak is 1,500 points, reached in November 2025: today they sit 20 points below it.
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,514 points, across 13 entrants.
How the rating moved
Between 1,480 and 1,500, across 2 events with history.
Last 2 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21/02/26 | Nexus Nights - 1v1 Cottonwood | 13 | 1514 | 10° | 1–2 | -20 |
| 22/11/25 | Nexus Nights - Multiplayer Cottonwood | 14 | — | 6° | 0–0–1 | 0 |
Form and consistency
On a 1-loss streak.
- Under 16 2 events 25%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →