Capt Overkill
#6,130 in the world · #476 in Canada · in the top 14% nationally. 20 official events, 43 matches won and 27 lost.
- 1641±39Rating · margin ±39
- 1555Average field · 54 entr.
- 40%vs top 5% (6–9)
What they have done so far
- Has won 1 tournament. The biggest one had 24 players entered.
- Made top 8 15 times in 20 tournaments: 75% of the time.
- Their best run is 5 tournaments in a row with the rating going up.
- Their all-time peak is 1,667 points.
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,616 points, across 19 entrants.
- They are 45 points away from the top 250: Canada.
How the rating moved
Between 1,524 and 1,650, across 20 events with history.
Last 20 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27/08/26 | Thursday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 L1H 1A6 | 19 | 1616 | 11° | 1–2 | -8 |
| 14/08/26 | Weekly Nexus Night L1E 2R6 | 15 | 1564 | 7° | 2–0 | +25 |
| 08/08/26 | Riftbound Showdown Ottawa - F2FTour Gatineau | 594 | 1583 | 107° | 6–5 | -4 |
| 07/08/26 | 14:00 1v1 Constructed Showdown Grinder 2 - F2FTour Ottawa Gatineau | 136 | 1594 | 48° | 1–1 | +2 |
| 02/04/26 | Thursday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 L1H 1A6 | 16 | 1550 | 11° | 1–2 | -24 |
| 07/03/26 | Manta Trading - Summoner Skirmish - March L3R 8B4 | 23 | 1589 | 5° | 3–2 | +10 |
| 13/02/26 | Friday Night Nexus Nights - 1v1 L1E 2R6 | 15 | 1555 | 5° | 1–1–1 | -7 |
| 08/02/26 | Saturday Evening Spiritforged Pre-Rift Event L1H 1A6 | 24 | 1541 | 1° | 3–0–1 | +23 |
| 31/01/26 | Riftbound 2k L1E 2R6 | 20 | 1586 | 3° | 3–1–1 | +11 |
| 29/01/26 | Nexus Nights @ Esper M1C1B6 | 14 | 1547 | 2° | 3–1 | +18 |
| 05/01/26 | Monday Evening Riftbound Nexus - Open Play Ajax | 20 | 1504 | 3° | 0–0–1 | -3 |
| 03/01/26 | Manta Trading - Summoner Skirmish - January L3R 8B4 | 14 | 1580 | 5° | 2–1–1 | +9 |
| 27/12/25 | Saturday Afternoon Summoner Skirmish - Dec 27th Scarborough | 22 | 1543 | 3° | 4–2 | +20 |
| 22/12/25 | Monday Night Summoner Skirmish - December Ajax | 18 | 1541 | 8° | 2–1 | +13 |
| 20/12/25 | Manta Trading - Summoner Skirmish - December L3R 8B4 | 31 | 1565 | 8° | 3–2–1 | +18 |
| 12/12/25 | Summoner Skirmish - December 12th Courtice | 19 | 1557 | 5° | 2–2–1 | +14 |
| 06/12/25 | Esper Summoner Skirmish - December M1C1B6 | 17 | 1530 | 13° | 0–2 | -45 |
| 27/11/25 | Nexus @ Esper M1C1B6 | 19 | 1524 | 7° | 2–1–1 | +8 |
| 20/11/25 | Nexus Night @ Esper M1C1B6 | 24 | 1491 | 3° | 2–1 | +14 |
| 13/11/25 | Nexus Night @ Esper M1C1B6 | 24 | 1549 | 3° | 2–0–3 | +47 |
Form and consistency
On a 3-win streak.
- Events with 100+ entrants 2 events 54%
- 16 to 99 14 events 51%
- Under 16 4 events 62%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
- Mocha CA 1824 0–1
- 2KFromTheBridge CA 1801 0–1
- Feynman F CA 1770 2–0
- w2egg CA 1765 1–0
- BallRizudo CA 1763 1–2
- C Capitlist P CA 1750 0–2
- Kaalor CA 1746 1–0
- Ddragon999 CA 1743 1–0
- SpeciaIBerry CA 1721 0–2
- docdodo CA 1719 0–1
- RiftKrit CA 1697 0–1
- Shinoa CA 1695 0–1
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →