Deaneo
#36,858 in the world · #2,074 in Australia · in the top 76% nationally. 5 official events, 6 matches won and 10 lost.
- 1442±94Rating · margin ±94
- 1542Average field · 16 entr.
- 50%vs top 5% (1–1)
What they have done so far
- Made top 8 1 times in 5 tournaments: 20% of the time.
- Their all-time peak is 1,533 points.
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,570 points, across 16 entrants.
- They are 104 points away from the top 1,000: Australia.
How the rating moved
Between 1,442 and 1,523, across 5 events with history.
Last 5 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23/03/26 | Monday Morning Nexus Nights - 1v1 Miami | 14 | 1525 | 11° | 1–2 | -6 |
| 09/03/26 | Saturday that swapped weeks that ended up actualy being Monday 9th Miami | 18 | 1553 | 17° | 0–3 | -50 |
| 02/03/26 | Monday Morning Nexus Nights - 1v1 Miami | 16 | 1511 | 11° | 1–2 | -25 |
| 05/01/26 | Monday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Miami | 16 | 1570 | 4° | 2–1 | +25 |
| 22/12/25 | Monday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Miami | 14 | 1552 | 9° | 2–2 | -2 |
Form and consistency
On a 1-loss streak.
- 16 to 99 3 events 33%
- Under 16 2 events 43%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
- cDOliver AU 1757 0–1
- CBL DAGS AU 1722 1–0
- xX420Xx AU 1667 0–1
- JD3 AU 1649 0–1
- SummitTCG Nova AU 1604 2–0
- Sir Bear AU 1590 0–1
- BattlecityC AU 1577 0–1
- Kirko22 AU 1567 0–1
- ULTIMATE JEEPx10 AU 1556 0–1
- Joseph Joestar AU 1536 0–1
- Jett AU 1472 1–0
- Stargem AU 1460 0–1
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →