Dud21
#19,336 in the world · #18 in Latvia · in the top 43% nationally. 2 official events, 3 matches won and 2 lost.
- 1540±142Rating · margin ±142
- 1542Average field · 19 entr.
- —vs top 5%
What they have done so far
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,564 points, across 17 entrants.
How the rating moved
Between 1,492 and 1,540, across 2 events with history.
Last 2 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15/08/26 | Saturday Afternoon Nexus Nights - 1v1 Rīga | 17 | 1564 | 2° | 2–0–1 | +48 |
| 12/08/26 | Wednesday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Rīga | 21 | 1520 | 13° | 1–2 | -8 |
Form and consistency
On a 2-win streak.
- 16 to 99 2 events 50%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →