Latvia rankings

Who is actually strong in Latvia, and against whom. 42 players from Latvia have an Elo rating from official Riftbound tournaments, alongside how hard the field each of them faced really was. Players need at least 5 events to appear.

42Ranked players
1,749Best rating
LVLatvia

Latvia top 42

#	Player	Rating	Field	vs top 5%	Events	Record
1	Darkseer44 LV	1749±38▼5	155117 entr.	70%7–3	1784 games	57–18–968%
2	Somebody LV	1733±36▲9	155353 entr.	15%2–11	2398 games	59–25–1460%
3	Peeecis LV	1699±38▼27	154217 entr.	42%5–7	2284 games	52–27–562%
4	Trybex LV	1693±32	154226 entr.	25%3–9	32121 games	73–35–1360%
5	Ekavat LV	1676±35▼18	1551194 entr.	31%4–9	26104 games	66–22–1663%
6	Ceturtais LV	1645±76	154518 entr.	0%0–2	526 games	16–7–362%
7	Lenny LV	1638±38▲14	155117 entr.	31%5–11	1987 games	50–29–857%
8	mrgray11 LV	1638±55▼14	156316 entr.	44%4–5	940 games	23–13–458%
9	OrchidKudi LV	1622±74▲61	153020 entr.	—	722 games	15–768%
10	NekuTheReaper LV	1620±37▼14	154217 entr.	8%1–11	2589 games	52–33–458%
11	Sexy Sex Beast LV	1603±39▼2	154117 entr.	38%3–5	2280 games	42–24–1453%
12	Ulquiorra2323 LV	1586±55▼4	154618 entr.	20%1–4	1141 games	22–16–354%
13	Darkwood Tavern LV	1580±78	152716 entr.	0%0–2	620 games	11–8–155%
14	Leaxter LV	1579±54▲99	153418 entr.	40%2–3	1242 games	19–16–745%
15	TikiWiki LV	1563±72	153216 entr.	0%0–2	724 games	14–9–158%
16	Promised Dororo LV	1563±82	152821 entr.	0%0–1	518 games	10–856%
17	Hlupars LV	1541±47▲13	153818 entr.	0%0–2	1755 games	24–26–544%
18	Jarif LV	1540±76	152620 entr.	0%0–3	721 games	9–10–243%
19	QuntinTaranTeemo LV	1495±87▼23	153622 entr.	0%0–1	516 games	6–7–338%
20	Keinash LV	1486±71	153817 entr.	0%0–1	931 games	13–17–142%
21	Raza LV	1486±97	151618 entr.	—	513 games	6–746%
22	riftbound LV	1482±83	154616 entr.	0%0–3	522 games	10–1245%
23	druskaN LV	1477±68	153717 entr.	—	827 games	9–15–333%
24	Maccros LV	1470±65▲9	152419 entr.	0%0–4	929 games	7–12–1024%
25	fredyboom LV	1462±73▼16	152020 entr.	—	723 games	7–13–330%
26	Baraquito LV	1457±55	153619 entr.	0%0–2	1441 games	16–20–539%
27	Gachi Itachi LV	1450±70	152419 entr.	0%0–1	825 games	9–15–136%
28	Too Cute To Care LV	1450±84▲17	153620 entr.	—	517 games	6–1135%
29	Frikenstein14 LV	1447±86	155115 entr.	0%0–4	520 games	8–11–140%
30	Helkarir LV	1444±66	153817 entr.	0%0–3	828 games	9–17–232%
31	Nazahn LV	1428±70	153018 entr.	—	725 games	9–1636%
32	Ni Tsu Reida LV	1424±53	153818 entr.	0%0–1	1345 games	14–26–531%
33	Rasmuks LV	1414±82▼12	151817 entr.	—	618 games	5–12–128%
34	Gabelail LV	1407±69	153919 entr.	0%0–3	726 games	7–16–327%
35	Dirigents LV	1406±45▼12	153517 entr.	0%0–3	1962 games	21–37–434%
36	Opt1fresh LV	1397±73	153816 entr.	25%1–3	829 games	8–19–228%
37	Glowense LV	1393±72	153518 entr.	0%0–2	830 games	10–19–133%
38	Heianir LV	1382±69	151919 entr.	0%0–1	926 games	6–15–523%
39	SneakyPeacok LV	1380±97▼12	152018 entr.	—	513 games	1–10–28%
40	Rikijs LV	1366±61	153917 entr.	0%0–6	1347 games	11–34–223%
41	Frikenstein14 LV	1336±85	151616 entr.	0%0–1	620 games	3–16–115%
42	NatahnB LV	1311±90▼53	153420 entr.	—	515 games	0–14–10%

What the Field column means

Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.

What the ± next to the rating means

It is the uncertainty of our estimate, and it has two causes. The first is statistical: with few matches the number is a guess, with hundreds it is a measurement — the standard error goes from ±60 at thirty matches to ±13 at seven hundred. The second is time: a player's real strength changes, so a rating that has not moved in six months is worth less than yesterday's, even with the same number of matches. The two add in quadrature. A wide margin on someone with many matches means they have not played in a long time. It is not Glicko-2's RD — we use Elo, and this is the error of our own estimate, which is what we can honestly say.

Leaderboards by country

What this number is worth

A higher rating is not a promise. Across our history the player favoured by Elo wins 60.7% of matches, and the Brier score is 0.235 against the 0.25 a coin flip would get: the signal is real, but modest. It is there to size up a field, not to call a tournament. Ratings start from a common value and move only on official matches recorded by UVS Games, so players with few events stay near the average by construction.

Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →