Guatemala rankings

Who is actually strong in Guatemala, and against whom. 28 players from Guatemala have an Elo rating from official Riftbound tournaments, alongside how hard the field each of them faced really was. Players need at least 5 events to appear.

28Ranked players
1,770Best rating
GTGuatemala

Guatemala top 28

#	Player	Rating	Field	vs top 5%	Events	Record
1	Xapo GT	1770±32	1565430 entr.	55%21–17	25134 games	87–37–1065%
2	Deyglin GT	1717±74	155416 entr.	40%2–3	523 games	17–4–274%
3	Pablo Duque GT	1705±42	1564518 entr.	27%4–11	1578 games	45–26–758%
4	Yuya 4IQ GT	1674±43	1558236 entr.	38%5–8	1468 games	40–20–859%
5	Hicarus GT	1658±48	154817 entr.	33%2–4	1556 games	34–17–561%
6	BerdicaRugginosa GT	1641±47	1568299 entr.	40%4–6	1258 games	31–18–953%
7	Kaladim GT	1640±48	154829 entr.	67%2–1	1456 games	31–19–655%
8	JPBUS1998 GT	1628±44	1560219 entr.	31%4–9	1566 games	37–25–456%
9	SoyUnKaos GT	1589±57	156217 entr.	11%1–8	838 games	22–15–158%
10	MasterFreak GT	1585±55	154118 entr.	—	1241 games	24–13–459%
11	PatataZalada GT	1571±80	152019 entr.	50%1–1	624 games	13–9–254%
12	AngelesyCuervos GT	1569±55▲31	154616 entr.	0%0–4	940 games	21–16–353%
13	Pochii GT	1560±80	156215 entr.	0%0–4	519 games	11–858%
14	MALC914 GT	1557±69	155718 entr.	0%0–3	834 games	18–12–453%
15	Jerv8 GT	1544±83	151916 entr.	100%2–0	518 games	8–6–444%
16	JJAlvarezF GT	1532±72	153614 entr.	0%0–6	624 games	11–11–246%
17	Nevermore GT	1529±82	152419 entr.	50%1–1	623 games	8–10–535%
18	isjavi GT	1515±70	154215 entr.	0%0–3	625 games	11–12–244%
19	Biodiversal GT	1494±67	154016 entr.	0%0–1	628 games	11–15–239%
20	BlackHound GT	1477±59	155416 entr.	0%0–5	836 games	11–20–531%
21	The Anomaly GT	1465±71	154017 entr.	—	625 games	9–12–436%
22	OniPunpun GT	1452±61	153915 entr.	0%0–1	934 games	13–19–238%
23	CRI5SIS GT	1434±86	153616 entr.	0%0–1	617 games	4–9–424%
24	Cow GT	1419±95	153220 entr.	100%1–0	516 games	4–9–325%
25	VanDerShine1718 GT	1413±93	152717 entr.	0%0–1	517 games	3–10–418%
26	Adjaleva GT	1411±76▼43	153220 entr.	0%0–1	521 games	5–12–424%
27	El Ñablo GT	1409±65	154720 entr.	25%1–3	830 games	10–18–233%
28	Orgasmike GT	1408±72	1534122 entr.	0%0–2	1032 games	5–18–916%

What the Field column means

Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.

What the ± next to the rating means

It is the uncertainty of our estimate, and it has two causes. The first is statistical: with few matches the number is a guess, with hundreds it is a measurement — the standard error goes from ±60 at thirty matches to ±13 at seven hundred. The second is time: a player's real strength changes, so a rating that has not moved in six months is worth less than yesterday's, even with the same number of matches. The two add in quadrature. A wide margin on someone with many matches means they have not played in a long time. It is not Glicko-2's RD — we use Elo, and this is the error of our own estimate, which is what we can honestly say.

Leaderboards by country

What this number is worth

A higher rating is not a promise. Across our history the player favoured by Elo wins 60.7% of matches, and the Brier score is 0.235 against the 0.25 a coin flip would get: the signal is real, but modest. It is there to size up a field, not to call a tournament. Ratings start from a common value and move only on official matches recorded by UVS Games, so players with few events stay near the average by construction.

Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →