Norway rankings

Who is actually strong in Norway, and against whom. 40 players from Norway have an Elo rating from official Riftbound tournaments, alongside how hard the field each of them faced really was. Players need at least 5 events to appear.

40Ranked players
1,704Best rating
NONorway

Norway top 41

#	Player	Rating	Field	vs top 5%	Events	Record
1	JavelinCrit NO	1704±48▼7	1574875 entr.	36%4–7	1154 games	32–15–759%
2	fishyard NO	1698±75	154221 entr.	—	628 games	20–2–671%
3	Red NO	1677±32▲10	1538433 entr.	46%6–7	26120 games	73–33–1461%
4	3J4 NO	1663±36▲61	1527300 entr.	67%2–1	2298 games	51–33–1452%
5	Boole NO	1662±44▲8	153522 entr.	—	1464 games	32–14–1850%
6	MoonTheEvil NO	1646±54▼4	15981,460 entr.	38%3–5	1043 games	25–15–358%
7	ostespiseren NO	1634±47	151419 entr.	—	1558 games	33–18–757%
8	Nithraw NO	1619±57▼2	152324 entr.	—	837 games	21–13–357%
9	TT FizzY NO	1616±52	1538149 entr.	0%0–2	1678 games	40–28–1051%
10	Playa NO	1613±48▲3	1538276 entr.	0%0–4	1354 games	30–17–756%
11	PolarChicken NO	1603±65▼3	1561706 entr.	0%0–2	829 games	15–7–752%
12	SinTxD NO	1600±33▼25	152754 entr.	0%0–1	26111 games	55–32–2450%
13	Jachaa NO	1594±61▼1	153525 entr.	0%0–2	633 games	15–12–645%
14	Chewy006 NO	1579±48	1532310 entr.	17%1–5	2191 games	41–29–2145%
15	Thugga NO	1577±43▼4	153121 entr.	—	1867 games	36–18–1354%
16	Værmeldinga NO	1568±46	151719 entr.	—	1660 games	26–20–1443%
17	Bullfrog NO	1563±56	1555703 entr.	0%0–2	840 games	18–15–745%
18	N0T Legal NO	1559±61▲60	15731,182 entr.	13%1–7	733 games	15–1845%
19	TT Timerin0 NO	1552±35▲11	1536384 entr.	50%2–2	25102 games	44–40–1843%
20	Duck NO	1547±78▲20	1532115 entr.	0%0–2	520 games	8–7–540%
21	TT Lethal NO	1544±31▲24	1534328 entr.	29%2–5	31134 games	64–51–1948%
22	rondonden NO	1525±72	152022 entr.	—	731 games	14–13–445%
23	Lankern NO	1524±79	153121 entr.	—	720 games	7–8–535%
24	Muso NO	1520±36▲43	1540370 entr.	0%0–3	2093 games	38–38–1741%
25	JVM NO	1520±68	1550148 entr.	0%0–3	837 games	16–17–443%
26	Bobburu NO	1518±42	152532 entr.	—	1974 games	28–30–1638%
27	Shaposi NO	1482±59	152449 entr.	—	1354 games	16–21–1730%
28	lorebin NO	1454±87	153719 entr.	—	519 games	6–9–432%
29	Muazam NO	1443±65	151422 entr.	—	1042 games	12–21–929%
30	Sir Chibi NO	1441±70	1545374 entr.	0%0–1	625 games	6–15–424%
31	Turbochargd NO	1436±42▼15	151519 entr.	—	2070 games	19–39–1227%
32	TT Eli NO	1425±50▲38	1516126 entr.	0%0–1	1449 games	10–26–1320%
33	Lund NO	1425±63	150817 entr.	—	1031 games	8–18–526%
34	Turbochargd NO	1424±63	151819 entr.	—	1246 games	13–24–928%
35	Mr catfish NO	1422±82▲8	150719 entr.	—	518 games	4–9–522%
36	Volcanic Viper NO	1421±78	1546575 entr.	0%0–3	620 games	4–13–320%
37	Turbochargd NO	1413±70	151867 entr.	—	1034 games	8–19–724%
38	DeckardKaine2 NO	1410±40▲5	151320 entr.	—	2179 games	21–42–1627%
39	Lassolass NO	1371±78	151523 entr.	—	725 games	3–16–612%
40	DeckardKaine2 NO	1338±87	151420 entr.	—	520 games	3–13–415%
41	issick NO	1321±60	150817 entr.	—	1135 games	5–24–614%

What the Field column means

Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.

What the ± next to the rating means

It is the uncertainty of our estimate, and it has two causes. The first is statistical: with few matches the number is a guess, with hundreds it is a measurement — the standard error goes from ±60 at thirty matches to ±13 at seven hundred. The second is time: a player's real strength changes, so a rating that has not moved in six months is worth less than yesterday's, even with the same number of matches. The two add in quadrature. A wide margin on someone with many matches means they have not played in a long time. It is not Glicko-2's RD — we use Elo, and this is the error of our own estimate, which is what we can honestly say.

Leaderboards by country

What this number is worth

A higher rating is not a promise. Across our history the player favoured by Elo wins 60.7% of matches, and the Brier score is 0.235 against the 0.25 a coin flip would get: the signal is real, but modest. It is there to size up a field, not to call a tournament. Ratings start from a common value and move only on official matches recorded by UVS Games, so players with few events stay near the average by construction.

Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →