Malta rankings
Who is actually strong in Malta, and against whom. 63 players from Malta have an Elo rating from official Riftbound tournaments, alongside how hard the field each of them faced really was. Players need at least 5 events to appear.
- 63Ranked players
- 1,800Best rating
- MTMalta
Malta top 63
| # | Player | Rating | Trend | Field | vs top 5% | Events | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Basis MT | 1800±22▲27 | 1550351 entr. | 32%13–28 | 50258 games | 168–55–3565% | |
| 2 | Ayjay MT | 1785±27▲7 | 1551144 entr. | 44%7–9 | 33175 games | 127–24–2473% | |
| 3 | Don Ritardo MT | 1698±47 | 1537153 entr. | 30%7–16 | 22114 games | 70–31–1361% | |
| 4 | CrusherMT MT | 1687±32 | 1533146 entr. | 10%1–9 | 29129 games | 67–37–2552% | |
| 5 | Brimba MT | 1669±36▲9 | 1573623 entr. | 7%1–14 | 2196 games | 46–44–648% | |
| 6 | Xaqla MT | 1664±28▼20 | 1546314 entr. | 33%7–14 | 33156 games | 90–47–1958% | |
| 7 | Maenic MT | 1655±66 | 15961,285 entr. | 38%3–5 | 528 games | 17–10–161% | |
| 8 | Bugrum MT | 1647±43 | 1535216 entr. | 17%1–5 | 1569 games | 41–22–659% | |
| 9 | Meticulous MT | 1626±60▼12 | 156220 entr. | 0%0–4 | 734 games | 20–13–159% | |
| 10 | The Star Forger MT | 1621±28 | 153220 entr. | 15%3–17 | 42187 games | 98–69–2052% | |
| 11 | Rotspa MT | 1619±26▲30 | 1550306 entr. | 0%0–20 | 41188 games | 87–82–1946% | |
| 12 | Steelbro MT | 1611±25▲15 | 1543218 entr. | 16%4–21 | 43210 games | 119–67–2457% | |
| 13 | NatzuTempest MT | 1606±35 | 1527133 entr. | 0%0–7 | 26119 games | 61–43–1551% | |
| 14 | Healey09 MT | 1597±32▼19 | 1559179 entr. | 27%6–16 | 24120 games | 64–41–1553% | |
| 15 | Alfie Solomons MT | 1596±52 | 1538114 entr. | 0%0–11 | 1471 games | 33–27–1146% | |
| 16 | Driodos MT | 1592±29▼40 | 1533146 entr. | 12%2–15 | 33148 games | 75–58–1551% | |
| 17 | shiny mudkip MT | 1582±29▼28 | 1543202 entr. | 11%3–24 | 31150 games | 78–56–1652% | |
| 18 | IrouSamurai MT | 1579±56 | 1532445 entr. | 33%1–2 | 1040 games | 18–14–845% | |
| 19 | Kooldiagon MT | 1575±51 | 154147 entr. | 38%3–5 | 1881 games | 41–29–1151% | |
| 20 | BEAR111111111111 MT | 1569±50▲10 | 154160 entr. | 20%1–4 | 1149 games | 24–19–649% | |
| 21 | ghoulfreakzs123 MT | 1553±43 | 1532230 entr. | 0%0–1 | 1568 games | 35–27–651% | |
| 22 | Cnoqqu MT | 1553±76 | 153318 entr. | 0%0–1 | 628 games | 14–6–850% | |
| 23 | MythicGlyph MT | 1540±69 | 153221 entr. | 0%0–4 | 839 games | 17–16–644% | |
| 24 | DaemOn663 MT | 1528±39 | 1563662 entr. | 20%3–12 | 2085 games | 34–46–540% | |
| 25 | Kaziragi MT | 1528±48▼14 | 153020 entr. | 0%0–7 | 1253 games | 21–24–840% | |
| 26 | Lord Dramath MT | 1524±33▲32 | 1547107 entr. | 17%1–5 | 25116 games | 56–44–1648% | |
| 27 | AhegaoMancer MT | 1524±39 | 152221 entr. | 0%0–5 | 2190 games | 35–43–1239% | |
| 28 | Deadxot MT | 1517±46 | 152619 entr. | 0%0–3 | 1460 games | 26–27–743% | |
| 29 | Mettu17 MT | 1507±39 | 1531213 entr. | 0%0–4 | 2282 games | 21–39–2226% | |
| 30 | Xadina MT | 1503±60 | 154023 entr. | 40%2–3 | 1150 games | 23–26–146% | |
| 31 | AnatlusNayr MT | 1501±40 | 153621 entr. | 0%0–5 | 1881 games | 36–38–744% | |
| 32 | Diamondproix MT | 1498±79 | 152023 entr. | 0%0–2 | 625 games | 9–11–536% | |
| 33 | coni boss MT | 1492±63 | 151623 entr. | 0%0–2 | 731 games | 12–14–539% | |
| 34 | TheAlbanianRhino MT | 1492±72 | 153420 entr. | 0%0–1 | 624 games | 10–12–242% | |
| 35 | Gababe214 MT | 1489±69 | 155119 entr. | 50%1–1 | 626 games | 10–15–138% | |
| 36 | Cinoklu MT | 1488±41 | 1532196 entr. | 0%0–2 | 1782 games | 36–35–1144% | |
| 37 | Souldead25 MT | 1477±43 | 1523256 entr. | 33%1–2 | 1869 games | 19–37–1328% | |
| 38 | Soulsborne MT | 1473±48 | 1538556 entr. | 33%1–2 | 1354 games | 19–26–935% | |
| 39 | Clark Xaqla MT | 1463±40▼23 | 1549230 entr. | 0%0–4 | 1875 games | 24–44–732% | |
| 40 | Pizella MT | 1461±55 | 1550625 entr. | 50%1–1 | 1041 games | 14–22–534% | |
| 41 | Ventus MT | 1460±49 | 1530152 entr. | 0%0–5 | 2298 games | 35–47–1636% | |
| 42 | Pizel MT | 1457±33▲4 | 153420 entr. | 0%0–4 | 28115 games | 34–66–1530% | |
| 43 | 00 Djentleman 00 MT | 1456±66 | 151923 entr. | 0%0–2 | 837 games | 11–19–730% | |
| 44 | Paul Walker MT | 1455±42 | 1545306 entr. | 0%0–4 | 1971 games | 23–39–932% | |
| 45 | iuNw7FUFb8 MT | 1449±55 | 152231 entr. | 0%0–6 | 1462 games | 19–31–1231% | |
| 46 | izzy MT | 1447±81 | 152722 entr. | 0%0–1 | 623 games | 7–14–230% | |
| 47 | Kolesterol MT | 1445±53 | 151922 entr. | 17%1–5 | 1979 games | 28–40–1135% | |
| 48 | Legacy MT | 1439±30 | 153327 entr. | 18%2–9 | 38153 games | 51–81–2133% | |
| 49 | GRABIEL MT | 1415±76 | 152721 entr. | 0%0–1 | 726 games | 7–18–127% | |
| 50 | MythicGlyph MT | 1412±48 | 151717 entr. | 0%0–1 | 1356 games | 15–30–1127% | |
| 51 | T4NTI MT | 1412±77 | 151889 entr. | — | 627 games | 8–14–530% | |
| 52 | ZonqorPBE MT | 1409±58 | 151722 entr. | 0%0–3 | 1354 games | 13–29–1224% | |
| 53 | Benito MT | 1402±32▲31 | 1536178 entr. | 0%0–7 | 28125 games | 39–74–1231% | |
| 54 | sleepypoo MT | 1402±49 | 151822 entr. | 0%0–3 | 1354 games | 12–30–1222% | |
| 55 | Legacy MT | 1390±85 | 1520142 entr. | 0%0–3 | 621 games | 4–15–219% | |
| 56 | Kalanku MT | 1383±80 | 1545132 entr. | 0%0–2 | 524 games | 5–15–421% | |
| 57 | AlphaWolfMLT MT | 1381±60 | 152121 entr. | 0%0–3 | 1253 games | 14–32–726% | |
| 58 | dizzy MT | 1381±66 | 152422 entr. | 0%0–1 | 729 games | 7–19–324% | |
| 59 | CrowCalamity MT | 1374±67 | 152623 entr. | — | 836 games | 7–19–1019% | |
| 60 | EmanueleEllul MT | 1371±66 | 151917 entr. | — | 929 games | 6–19–421% | |
| 61 | SilentMist08 MT | 1341±56 | 152923 entr. | — | 1668 games | 13–45–1019% | |
| 62 | k61cape MT | 1333±69 | 152118 entr. | — | 933 games | 4–23–612% | |
| 63 | K1zki MT | 1312±85 | 150723 entr. | — | 617 games | 0–14–30% |
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
What the ± next to the rating means
It is the uncertainty of our estimate, and it has two causes. The first is statistical: with few matches the number is a guess, with hundreds it is a measurement — the standard error goes from ±60 at thirty matches to ±13 at seven hundred. The second is time: a player's real strength changes, so a rating that has not moved in six months is worth less than yesterday's, even with the same number of matches. The two add in quadrature. A wide margin on someone with many matches means they have not played in a long time. It is not Glicko-2's RD — we use Elo, and this is the error of our own estimate, which is what we can honestly say.
Leaderboards by country
- US United States 17,372
- IT Italy 4,182
- CA Canada 3,457
- ES Spain 2,882
- DE Germany 2,798
- AU Australia 2,724
- FR France 2,109
- GB United Kingdom 1,856
- PL Poland 970
- NZ New Zealand 732
- BR Brazil 595
- SG Singapore 593
- MX Mexico 533
- BE Belgium 516
- NL Netherlands 458
- AT Austria 389
- PT Portugal 374
- CL Chile 355
- GR Greece 338
- CH Switzerland 313
- HR Croatia 303
- PH Philippines 302
- MY Malaysia 291
- CZ Czechia 268
- SE Sweden 221
- TH Thailand 177
- BG Bulgaria 176
- DK Denmark 151
- RO Romania 122
- CO Colombia 121
- ID Indonesia 105
- IE Ireland 105
- AR Argentina 97
- SI Slovenia 92
- DO Dominican Republic 79
- RS Serbia 76
- PE Peru 73
- HU Hungary 71
- SK Slovakia 68
- FI Finland 63
- UY Uruguay 59
- CR Costa Rica 58
- TR Türkiye 47
- VN Vietnam 46
- LT Lithuania 44
- ZA South Africa 43
- LV Latvia 42
- NO Norway 40
- IL Israel 37
- CY Cyprus 31
- PA Panama 29
- GT Guatemala 28
- EC Ecuador 22
What this number is worth
A higher rating is not a promise. Across our history the player favoured by Elo wins 60.7% of matches, and the Brier score is 0.235 against the 0.25 a coin flip would get: the signal is real, but modest. It is there to size up a field, not to call a tournament. Ratings start from a common value and move only on official matches recorded by UVS Games, so players with few events stay near the average by construction.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →