Israel rankings
Who is actually strong in Israel, and against whom. 37 players from Israel have an Elo rating from official Riftbound tournaments, alongside how hard the field each of them faced really was. Players need at least 5 events to appear.
- 37Ranked players
- 1,771Best rating
- ILIsrael
Israel top 37
| # | Player | Rating | Trend | Field | vs top 5% | Events | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gvina IL | 1771±46 | 154521 entr. | 42%5–7 | 1361 games | 46–7–875% | |
| 2 | danikilir IL | 1760±45▲4 | 154119 entr. | 25%2–6 | 1461 games | 46–11–475% | |
| 3 | BlackWolf2032 IL | 1700±46 | 154521 entr. | 42%5–7 | 1360 games | 40–10–1067% | |
| 4 | gagus IL | 1637±45▲31 | 154320 entr. | 0%0–11 | 1460 games | 34–23–357% | |
| 5 | demondi IL | 1628±42 | 154787 entr. | 11%1–8 | 1673 games | 40–24–955% | |
| 6 | Nomis IL | 1618±42▼14 | 1548178 entr. | 17%1–5 | 1669 games | 42–21–661% | |
| 7 | Firavain IL | 1599±54▲22 | 153723 entr. | 25%1–3 | 1042 games | 20–17–548% | |
| 8 | HandsomeNoir IL | 1591±52▲15 | 153522 entr. | 17%1–5 | 1045 games | 23–15–751% | |
| 9 | Fortox IL | 1591±72 | 154623 entr. | 0%0–1 | 624 games | 13–7–454% | |
| 10 | Dorkeon IL | 1580±51▲28 | 153323 entr. | 0%0–3 | 1047 games | 23–15–949% | |
| 11 | Muffín IL | 1579±82 | 154222 entr. | 0%0–3 | 523 games | 11–5–748% | |
| 12 | Prsias IL | 1575±53 | 154818 entr. | 20%1–4 | 1044 games | 22–17–550% | |
| 13 | shadowxxsilent IL | 1566±66 | 152416 entr. | 0%0–5 | 1039 games | 21–14–454% | |
| 14 | wizardnamedoz IL | 1562±63▼10 | 1540163 entr. | 67%2–1 | 731 games | 16–12–352% | |
| 15 | TheDdoc IL | 1554±68 | 153623 entr. | 25%1–3 | 627 games | 13–11–348% | |
| 16 | AmiRaj IL | 1546±63 | 153122 entr. | 0%0–2 | 732 games | 14–12–644% | |
| 17 | Mogatu IL | 1532±63 | 151417 entr. | 50%1–1 | 831 games | 15–14–248% | |
| 18 | Blaze IL | 1527±51▲28 | 154121 entr. | 20%1–4 | 1247 games | 20–19–843% | |
| 19 | bucketman2838 IL | 1524±83 | 152424 entr. | — | 621 games | 11–1052% | |
| 20 | GSG Oddjuan IL | 1520±82 | 151416 entr. | 0%0–2 | 622 games | 10–10–245% | |
| 21 | Shai9789 IL | 1515±72 | 153423 entr. | 0%0–2 | 524 games | 11–11–246% | |
| 22 | Shavar Oto IL | 1505±57▼29 | 153322 entr. | 20%1–4 | 937 games | 15–18–441% | |
| 23 | Semyaz IL | 1504±63▼5 | 153421 entr. | 0%0–2 | 731 games | 12–13–639% | |
| 24 | Void IL | 1503±72 | 1544408 entr. | 0%0–6 | 626 games | 11–14–142% | |
| 25 | TakNaIL IL | 1497±73 | 153423 entr. | 0%0–3 | 623 games | 10–10–343% | |
| 26 | pooshka IL | 1494±60 | 1541139 entr. | 20%1–4 | 835 games | 11–15–931% | |
| 27 | Grasp IL | 1491±67▼43 | 153522 entr. | 0%0–3 | 727 games | 13–13–148% | |
| 28 | MeaTyTv IL | 1484±68 | 151624 entr. | — | 727 games | 13–1448% | |
| 29 | Chronos213 IL | 1476±73▼15 | 154521 entr. | 0%0–1 | 623 games | 8–9–635% | |
| 30 | Chromosome IL | 1453±81 | 1544209 entr. | 50%1–1 | 522 games | 8–13–136% | |
| 31 | l Boss l IL | 1451±57▲57 | 154320 entr. | 0%0–2 | 938 games | 11–21–629% | |
| 32 | SomoKRoceS IL | 1448±78 | 154918 entr. | 0%0–1 | 520 games | 6–11–330% | |
| 33 | GolDragos IL | 1445±70 | 152522 entr. | 14%1–6 | 732 games | 9–19–428% | |
| 34 | Deus Potato IL | 1431±65 | 153923 entr. | — | 729 games | 9–16–431% | |
| 35 | kikogeva IL | 1389±77 | 153817 entr. | 0%0–1 | 521 games | 4–13–419% | |
| 36 | Semyaz IL | 1376±74▼23 | 153124 entr. | 0%0–2 | 522 games | 5–14–323% | |
| 37 | Sir Dimples IL | 1342±63▼18 | 152724 entr. | — | 931 games | 6–21–419% |
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
What the ± next to the rating means
It is the uncertainty of our estimate, and it has two causes. The first is statistical: with few matches the number is a guess, with hundreds it is a measurement — the standard error goes from ±60 at thirty matches to ±13 at seven hundred. The second is time: a player's real strength changes, so a rating that has not moved in six months is worth less than yesterday's, even with the same number of matches. The two add in quadrature. A wide margin on someone with many matches means they have not played in a long time. It is not Glicko-2's RD — we use Elo, and this is the error of our own estimate, which is what we can honestly say.
Leaderboards by country
- US United States 17,372
- IT Italy 4,182
- CA Canada 3,457
- ES Spain 2,882
- DE Germany 2,798
- AU Australia 2,724
- FR France 2,109
- GB United Kingdom 1,856
- PL Poland 970
- NZ New Zealand 732
- BR Brazil 595
- SG Singapore 593
- MX Mexico 533
- BE Belgium 516
- NL Netherlands 458
- AT Austria 389
- PT Portugal 374
- CL Chile 355
- GR Greece 338
- CH Switzerland 313
- HR Croatia 303
- PH Philippines 302
- MY Malaysia 291
- CZ Czechia 268
- SE Sweden 221
- TH Thailand 177
- BG Bulgaria 176
- DK Denmark 151
- RO Romania 122
- CO Colombia 121
- ID Indonesia 105
- IE Ireland 105
- AR Argentina 97
- SI Slovenia 92
- DO Dominican Republic 79
- RS Serbia 76
- PE Peru 73
- HU Hungary 71
- SK Slovakia 68
- MT Malta 63
- FI Finland 63
- UY Uruguay 59
- CR Costa Rica 58
- TR Türkiye 47
- VN Vietnam 46
- LT Lithuania 44
- ZA South Africa 43
- LV Latvia 42
- NO Norway 40
- CY Cyprus 31
- PA Panama 29
- GT Guatemala 28
- EC Ecuador 22
What this number is worth
A higher rating is not a promise. Across our history the player favoured by Elo wins 60.7% of matches, and the Brier score is 0.235 against the 0.25 a coin flip would get: the signal is real, but modest. It is there to size up a field, not to call a tournament. Ratings start from a common value and move only on official matches recorded by UVS Games, so players with few events stay near the average by construction.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →