Ecuador rankings

Who is actually strong in Ecuador, and against whom. 22 players from Ecuador have an Elo rating from official Riftbound tournaments, alongside how hard the field each of them faced really was. Players need at least 5 events to appear.

22Ranked players
1,757Best rating
ECEcuador

Ecuador top 22

#	Player	Rating	Field	vs top 5%	Events	Record
1	josueantuan EC	1757±51	154816 entr.	—	1049 games	41–7–184%
2	dertop EC	1679±58	154216 entr.	40%2–3	1255 games	36–16–365%
3	Tasty Faefolk EC	1673±46	153716 entr.	75%3–1	1563 games	42–19–267%
4	DragoFenix2 EC	1613±52	153916 entr.	0%0–2	1146 games	29–15–263%
5	IvyTIgerUTT EC	1590±85	153315 entr.	0%0–1	517 games	11–5–165%
6	Draven Time EC	1563±46	153316 entr.	0%0–2	1659 games	31–25–353%
7	Prunus EC	1550±73	154515 entr.	0%0–3	623 games	12–9–252%
8	Sczlr EC	1547±83	153715 entr.	—	518 games	8–9–144%
9	ironhoof EC	1538±55	153216 entr.	0%0–1	1143 games	20–18–547%
10	weedtian EC	1538±55	153716 entr.	0%0–3	1041 games	20–20–149%
11	Abyss18 EC	1536±67	153816 entr.	0%0–2	836 games	19–15–253%
12	Teemoaddict EC	1534±77	153818 entr.	—	626 games	12–11–346%
13	Joch EC	1502±77	154817 entr.	0%0–2	626 games	12–1446%
14	NoWar EC	1484±51	153516 entr.	0%0–2	1249 games	20–25–441%
15	gnrrox EC	1476±79	153016 entr.	—	620 games	9–1145%
16	jbeta9805 EC	1467±70	153816 entr.	0%0–2	832 games	13–17–241%
17	OgdenLufer EC	1467±68	153315 entr.	—	727 games	12–14–144%
18	IsaacB01 EC	1462±75	154416 entr.	0%0–1	622 games	9–1341%
19	Litus EC	1450±54	153816 entr.	0%0–2	1143 games	15–23–535%
20	Heljarmadr EC	1446±61	153616 entr.	0%0–4	1248 games	18–28–238%
21	Sradar EC	1396±61	151915 entr.	0%0–2	833 games	7–21–521%
22	andresaant EC	1273±77	152914 entr.	—	821 games	0–19–20%

What the Field column means

Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.

What the ± next to the rating means

It is the uncertainty of our estimate, and it has two causes. The first is statistical: with few matches the number is a guess, with hundreds it is a measurement — the standard error goes from ±60 at thirty matches to ±13 at seven hundred. The second is time: a player's real strength changes, so a rating that has not moved in six months is worth less than yesterday's, even with the same number of matches. The two add in quadrature. A wide margin on someone with many matches means they have not played in a long time. It is not Glicko-2's RD — we use Elo, and this is the error of our own estimate, which is what we can honestly say.

Leaderboards by country

What this number is worth

A higher rating is not a promise. Across our history the player favoured by Elo wins 60.7% of matches, and the Brier score is 0.235 against the 0.25 a coin flip would get: the signal is real, but modest. It is there to size up a field, not to call a tournament. Ratings start from a common value and move only on official matches recorded by UVS Games, so players with few events stay near the average by construction.

Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →