JosePickles
#16,599 in the world · #6,092 in United States · in the top 35% nationally. 26 official events, 56 matches won and 43 lost.
- 1557±49Rating · margin ±49
- 1541Average field · 20 entr.
- 20%vs top 5% (2–8)
What they have done so far
- Has won 2 tournaments. The biggest one had 17 players entered.
- Made top 8 16 times in 26 tournaments: 62% of the time.
- Their best run is 3 tournaments in a row with the rating going up.
- Their all-time peak is 1,628 points.
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,583 points, across 32 entrants.
- They are 20 points away from the top 5,000: United States.
How the rating moved
Between 1,504 and 1,620, across 26 events with history.
Last 26 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/03/26 | CCC March Summoner Skirmish Clovis | 15 | 1581 | 2° | 3–0–2 | +50 |
| 04/03/26 | Tuesday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Clovis | 14 | 1536 | 10° | 1–2 | -12 |
| 21/02/26 | 1K Cash Tournament Fresno | 32 | 1583 | 26° | 1–2–1 | -6 |
| 18/02/26 | CCC Nexus Night 2/17 Clovis | 20 | 1537 | 5° | 2–1 | +7 |
| 06/02/26 | Midnight Spiritforged Pre-Rift Event Fresno | 53 | 1538 | 26° | 2–4–1 | -26 |
| 17/01/26 | January Summoner Skirmish!! Fresno | 14 | 1552 | 8° | 2–2 | 0 |
| 20/12/25 | CCC December Summoner Skirmish Clovis | 16 | 1569 | 9° | 2–3 | -13 |
| 14/12/25 | Sunday Afternoon Summoner Skirmish - December fresno | 16 | 1571 | 4° | 1–3 | -20 |
| 07/12/25 | Sunday Afternoon Summoner Skirmish - December Fresno | 25 | 1521 | 9° | 2–2–1 | -12 |
| 05/12/25 | Riftbound Dec 4th Locals Fresno | 13 | 1534 | 7° | 1–2 | -26 |
| 29/11/25 | Saturday Morning Summoner Skirmish - December Fresno | 33 | 1547 | 11° | 3–2 | -5 |
| 26/11/25 | CCC Nexus Night Clovis | 18 | 1539 | 8° | 2–1 | +3 |
| 25/11/25 | Monday Nexus Night! Clovis | 13 | 1516 | 1° | 3–0 | +31 |
| 21/11/25 | Thursday Evening Nexus Night Fresno | 20 | 1503 | 11° | 2–3 | -25 |
| 20/11/25 | Nexus Night 11/19 Clovis | 14 | 1532 | 6° | 2–1 | +5 |
| 19/11/25 | Nexus Night 11/18 Clovis | 18 | 1546 | 6° | 2–1 | +8 |
| 16/11/25 | Sunday Afternoon Nexus Nights - 1v1 fresno | 14 | 1552 | 2° | 3–1 | +17 |
| 15/11/25 | Nexus Night Fresno | 16 | 1546 | 10° | 1–2–1 | -16 |
| 15/11/25 | Friday Evening Nexus Nights - 1v1 Fresno | 14 | 1529 | 6° | 2–2 | -9 |
| 14/11/25 | Thursday Evening Nexus Night Fresno | 15 | 1529 | 4° | 3–1 | +16 |
| 12/11/25 | CCC Nexus Night Clovis | 25 | 1528 | 3° | 3–0–2 | +34 |
| 09/11/25 | Saturday Evening Nexus Night Fresno | 22 | 1526 | 4° | 4–1 | +52 |
| 07/11/25 | Thursday Morning Nexus Night Fresno | 17 | 1535 | 16° | 1–3 | -45 |
| 06/11/25 | Wednesday Nexus Night Fresno | 23 | — | 14° | 1–3 | -60 |
| 05/11/25 | CCC Nexus Night Clovis | 17 | — | 1° | 4–0–1 | +71 |
| 01/11/25 | CCC Riftbound Release Event! Clovis | 24 | — | 6° | 3–1–1 | +38 |
Form and consistency
On a 2-loss streak.
- 16 to 99 17 events 47%
- Under 16 9 events 61%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →