TiO2E171
#9,477 in the world · #228 in Poland · in the top 24% nationally. 2 official events, 7 matches won and 1 lost.
- 1608±131Rating · margin ±131
- 1523Average field · 33 entr.
- —vs top 5%
What they have done so far
- The toughest field they have faced averaged 1,523 points, across 33 entrants.
How the rating moved
Between 1,597 and 1,608, across 2 events with history.
Last 2 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20/11/25 | Nexus Night w BaseStack Łódź Rewolucji 1905 roku 45 | 33 | 1523 | 7° | 2–1 | +11 |
| 06/11/25 | Turniej Riftbound Release w BaseStack Łódź! Rewolucji 1905 roku 45 | 51 | — | 2° | 5–0 | +97 |
Form and consistency
On a 2-win streak.
- 16 to 99 2 events 88%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →