SuggWolf
#41,412 in the world · #3,021 in Canada · in the top 88% nationally. 3 official events, 0 matches won and 5 lost.
- 1408±149Rating · margin ±149
- —Field
- —vs top 5%
What they have done so far
- Their all-time peak is 1,500 points.
How the rating moved
Between 1,408 and 1,479, across 3 events with history.
Last 3 events
| Date | Event | Entrants | Field | Pos. | Record | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25/11/25 | Riftbound Weekly Play! AB T5E 4C2 | 13 | — | 12° | 0–2 | -34 |
| 18/11/25 | Riftbound Weekly Play AB T5E 4C2 | 13 | — | 13° | 0–2 | -37 |
| 11/11/25 | Riftbound Weekly Play Edmonton | 19 | — | 16° | 0–1–1 | -21 |
Form and consistency
On a 6-loss streak.
- 16 to 99 1 events 0%
- Under 16 2 events 0%
The overall win rate hides this difference: some players dominate at their store and vanish at regionals. Here you can see it.
Toughest opponents faced
Sorted by the opponent's rating, with the head-to-head record. Beating a 1900-rated player counts for more than six wins against a regular at your local store.
- Asterock CA 1659 0–1
- CADENZA CA 1573 0–1
- AQuirkyMetaTCG CA 1543 0–1
- 7hor CA 1509 0–1
- Red Enthusiast CA 1453 0–1
- Kriselos CA 1404 0–1
What the Field column means
Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.
Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-02 05:41. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →