Ukraine rankings

Who is actually strong in Ukraine, and against whom. 24 players from Ukraine have an Elo rating from official Riftbound tournaments, alongside how hard the field each of them faced really was. Players need at least 5 events to appear.

24Ranked players
1,693Best rating
UAUkraine

Ukraine top 24

#	Player	Rating	Field	vs top 5%	Events	Record
1	KoFe UA	1693±66	153413 entr.	—	938 games	27–8–371%
2	dudeson UA	1676±63▲5923	152614 entr.	—	1344 games	31–7–670%
3	IrtLava UA	1656±59▲6989	152413 entr.	—	1755 games	32–12–1158%
4	Thaemar UA	1638±76	153112 entr.	—	931 games	20–9–265%
5	mystiXD UA	1614±75	152813 entr.	—	828 games	17–8–361%
6	Pavlo013 UA	1589±91	152513 entr.	—	518 games	10–3–556%
7	625th UA	1583±41▲18691	1528222 entr.	0%0–2	32115 games	69–34–1260%
8	rvdost UA	1572±37▲17725	1526154 entr.	0%0–5	3096 games	45–41–1047%
9	Max the Lord UA	1558±66	153113 entr.	—	1243 games	23–18–253%
10	soooqua UA	1555±53▲12457	151611 entr.	—	2375 games	35–29–1147%
11	AverKyiv UA	1552±68	153013 entr.	—	1036 games	16–12–844%
12	m3x ghost UA	1510±68▲28363	153716 entr.	—	1036 games	15–13–842%
13	Darren UA	1503±71▲26860	151926 entr.	0%0–2	831 games	11–9–1135%
14	Syl8s UA	1497±61▲37108	151914 entr.	—	1347 games	16–20–1134%
15	MaxKarp UA	1478±65▲18123	151613 entr.	—	1140 games	16–16–840%
16	MDirt UA	1467±68▲26696	150412 entr.	—	1035 games	10–17–829%
17	Mindartis UA	1463±73▲36783	151214 entr.	—	929 games	10–16–334%
18	maseyka UA	1449±78	151913 entr.	—	825 games	7–14–428%
19	Одиссей UA	1449±83	153710 entr.	0%0–1	720 games	6–13–130%
20	Miralina UA	1417±64▲35186	151114 entr.	—	1241 games	9–21–1122%
21	insearchfor1 UA	1395±59▲43684	151411 entr.	—	1553 games	11–27–1521%
22	AkkeBayer UA	1393±76	151513 entr.	—	827 games	6–18–322%
23	Max the Lord UA	1389±66▲37275	150912 entr.	—	1339 games	10–26–326%
24	ЗлойМорти UA	1371±64▲33335	150310 entr.	—	1541 games	11–28–227%

What the Field column means

Two columns Elo alone cannot give you. Field is the average rating of the opponents a player actually faced, with how many entrants their events had on average: the same score can be built grinding eight-player events against unrated opposition, or playing 200-player regionals. When the field stays around 1500 or events run under 16 entrants, the number is flagged. vs top 5% answers the same question match by match: how many they won against the 2,503 players rated above 1700. The gap is stark — some sit at 59%, others with a higher Elo sit at 30%. Computing these takes the full entry list of every event plus a rating system: sites that start from decklists cannot.

What the ± next to the rating means

It is the uncertainty of our estimate, and it has two causes. The first is statistical: with few matches the number is a guess, with hundreds it is a measurement — the standard error goes from ±60 at thirty matches to ±13 at seven hundred. The second is time: a player's real strength changes, so a rating that has not moved in six months is worth less than yesterday's, even with the same number of matches. The two add in quadrature. A wide margin on someone with many matches means they have not played in a long time. It is not Glicko-2's RD — we use Elo, and this is the error of our own estimate, which is what we can honestly say.

Leaderboards by country

What this number is worth

A higher rating is not a promise. Across our history the player favoured by Elo wins 60.7% of matches, and the Brier score is 0.235 against the 0.25 a coin flip would get: the signal is real, but modest. It is there to size up a field, not to call a tournament. Ratings start from a common value and move only on official matches recorded by UVS Games, so players with few events stay near the average by construction.

Ratings recomputed on 2026-09-11 01:10. The calculation runs twice a day on public standings from UVS Games events: between runs the scores do not change. How we compute the ranking →